This Is the System. If It Feels Unfamiliar…

… It Should.

QQSI isn’t modeling the men’s game. We’re running an intelligence operation inside women’s football.

You can call it unconventional.

You can call it overengineered.

You can call it unnecessary.

But we call it operational. Because that’s what it is.

The frameworks we use at QQSI were never supposed to look like football. They weren’t supposed to make people comfortable. They weren’t supposed to imitate what already exists in the sport.

They were built for a different environment—one defined by asymmetry, fragility, volatility, and signal distortion.

That’s the women’s game.

We didn’t borrow from counterterrorism, special operations, and intelligence because we wanted to be different. We did it because those are the only systems built for the conditions we actually work in.

Most people don’t understand what we’re solving for.

They think we’re trying to find the next big player. We’re not.

They think we’re trying to build predictive models. We’re not.

They think we’re just reframing scouting with military language. We’re not.

What we are solving for is timing. Asymmetry. Risk. Signal degradation. Developmental volatility. Visibility distortion. Environmental mismatch. Eligibility complexity. Psychological fragility.

If those things don’t matter in your system, then you’re not building one for the women’s game. You’re repackaging the men’s model and applying it in a space that plays differently.

We don’t do that.

We don’t run a player database. We run a targeting cycle.

At QQSI, we don’t compile names. We collapse variables. We don’t ask, “Is she good?” We ask: “Can she succeed where you are, with what you have, right now, under pressure?”

That process isn’t linear. It’s recursive. It’s governed by Find. Fix. Finish. —our core targeting cycle.

Find isn’t about discovery. It’s about extraction of hidden signal. Under-scouted leagues, developmental bottlenecks, dual nationals with suppressed visibility, incorrectly positioned profiles. We find what hasn’t been surfaced because we know where others stop looking.

Fix is our intelligence phase. The compression of unknowns. What’s the risk profile of relocation? How stable is the contract situation? Is her production inflated by her environment? Will her development collapse without the support she’s currently getting? What happens to her upside when you move her?

Finish is where we decide. It’s not a “recommendation.” It’s a position. A line in the sand. We deliver the go/no-go logic, the fit model, the timing signal, the failure conditions. If a club wants to move, they move from that brief.

Most clubs never get here. Most scouting departments stall somewhere between Find and Fix. They fall into cycles of indecision, over-analysis, or conventional vetting. But the match will be played. The window will close. The moment will pass.

We’re not here to model theory. We’re here to deliver Finish.

We don’t run comps. We run disposition matrices.

You’ve seen the spreadsheet. But the worksheet is not the point. It’s just the interface. What powers the worksheet is the logic underneath it—modeled on target disposition protocols from CT operations.

Here’s what we mean by that.

You enter just two numbers:

1. Evaluator Score (0–10): Your raw belief in her talent.
2. Club Weight (0–1): Your internal need. Not in theory. Now.

The rest is calculated by the system. Not by instinct. Not by groupthink. Not by form.

• CEI (Contextual Equity Index) measures visibility distortion. It corrects for suppressed environments and overexposed ones.
• ETI (Environmental Threat Index) flags where performance is condition-dependent or inflated by unsustainable variables.
• BASC (Bias-Adjusted Scout Confidence) normalizes for evaluator inflation.
• SCC (Scout Confidence Consistency) tests belief across time and setting.
• Cycle Coverage evaluates if the player has been seen across a full hormonal and emotional timeline—something no men’s model accounts for.
• Potential Multiplier applies your calculated developmental headroom based on fit, timing, and structural readiness.

The model then issues a Recruitment Disposition—not a score, not a star rating. A go, wait, monitor, or walk. What we call a signal.

And if the signal’s strong: it’s your moment to move.

This system is not predictive. It’s preemptive.

It’s built to control for missteps under pressure.

It’s built to say: this one’s real, and this is when.

The Last Mile: where upside becomes reality—or doesn’t.

This is the phase no one models. Because this is the phase where everyone defaults to instinct.

You’ve narrowed your list to five. You can sign two. The analysis is over. Now comes the part no one is trained to assess:

• Who adapts fastest?
• Who unlocks downstream value in marketing or nationality caps?
• Who creates new locker room dynamics—good or bad?
• Who needs an extra visa?
• Who’s burned out from overuse or menstrual suppression?
• Who is three months away from emotional collapse?

This is where careers are made—or buried. Not during the scouting. But in The Last Mile.

We model this phase explicitly.

Because too many clubs don’t survive it.

Targeted Strategic Force: what QQSI actually is.

You can think of us as scouts if you want.

You can call us consultants.

You can call us a white paper firm.

But what we actually are is a targeted strategic force.

We don’t do volume.

We don’t pitch players.

We don’t deliver dashboards.

We deliver:

• Precision: what matters, nothing more.
• Restraint: we don’t overreach—we isolate high-impact actions.
• Timing: not just who to sign, but when to strike.
• Clarity: no hedging, no “it depends.” Just signal.

You don’t have to understand it.

But you won’t out-execute it.

This isn’t just a recruitment system.

It’s an operational decision-making architecture.

It informs tactical planning.

It powers opposition analysis.

It supports strategic timing models.

It clarifies who you are as a team—and who you’re not.

It replaces instinct with signal.

It doesn’t mirror the men’s game.

It was built specifically because this game is different.

Same sport. Different game.

Different threats.

Different noise.

Different rules of engagement.

So we built a system that works the way women’s football actually behaves.

We’re not here to fix the old system.

We’re here to replace it.

Not because it’s flawed.

Because it was never built for this game.